|
| PDSH 1011$ T$ u8 [; _4 ]( ?" n
| Annex B
1 s5 u1 B. F) p! _- W& i R7 R | Annex B
6 W Z+ q- J0 V | 61347-1(ed.1);am1 & 61347-1(ed.2);am1 & 61347-2-9(ed.1);am1;am28 T& q# Q; l+ y. ?) P& J
| & T0 @+ h" E- u1 R6 D/ l3 A5 s
Standard(s):
; q8 v& B' {' \- FIEC 61347-1
. r" b; s- q0 yIEC 61347-2-9 All editions7 W6 @3 e0 v8 {9 z
Subclause(s): Annex B) ?3 J1 y; h" `
No. Year PDSH 1011 2010
/ q& I$ M+ F6 OCategory: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM
, u8 f+ N& ~+ J) C x" [/ sSubject:
& ]' n& d3 o8 k! j; f- dAnnex B: T7 e* h( T2 F
Key words:
, u$ B. b1 G( \2 _; {- Discharge lamps
5 Y9 m2 ~( P6 Y# C$ F/ }) s5 {- Thermal protector6 S( R8 `1 T2 r4 K8 F$ ~# A
- IEC 60730-2-95 Q! y) u# {; S' y6 |3 P# H0 h
To be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 2012
, `$ x6 N7 H+ V3 j* I2 `" S. @ eQuestion:9 A8 v: f+ E/ F
Would it would be acceptable that a thermally protected ballast for discharge lamps (according to Annex4 V: Q' O4 t% ` T! B# P; l
B of IEC 61347-2-9), include a thermal protector control according to IEC 60730-2-9 instead of a thermal* p( U2 Q1 Q+ q/ H
protector in compliance with IEC 60730-2-3?: {; W- \9 E% Z! e4 }4 c* a" V3 p
Decision:
4 T( m( j8 k2 C N2 mNo. Reference to IEC 60730-2-9 is not acceptable.
* ]+ t! s, f# P" a: n5 f* `1 U
+ [ @& T& j( M* S u0 P$ S
$ k* F6 Q- ? r7 V8 T F |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|