|
| DSH 281# v9 U" d$ w1 I1 E
2 {8 @6 M1 p# Y3 C4 x | Open circuit of conductor of PCB during tests of clause 19) j* C% T8 W( h5 X4 i
| 19.11.2
# i/ r1 S6 C D A9 a | 60335-1(ed.3)
- g6 z# R; I) G" Q |
$ Q0 \ B4 L) W0 _ h5 _Standard: IEC 60335-1, Ed. 3.0 Sub clause: 19.11.2 Sheet n. 281
- L7 K- U2 @; o5 E& U. o/ dPage 1(1)
$ [5 S) H. g( }7 \Subject: Open circuit of conductor
" \# ^& ?. `# ]+ ] zof PCB during tests of clause 19
0 T4 }4 r! R9 Y! t, B" V1 XKey words:5 N" t+ R3 p# I6 N5 `3 e
- PCB1 F/ E; h+ z9 R* a, g) M
Conductor: m+ F1 M0 I# u) U+ w* ^
Decision n. 20 taken' i/ w" Y: l0 z7 R1 I
At 36th meeting/1999 @, H6 N% n4 A& k# P- S
Question: When conducting test of sub-clause 19.11.1 one conductor of PCB blow up
& c; c- }8 _ _) J; MTaking into account that:3 H) J1 e* z! {
- the material of PCB withstands the burning test of sub-clause 20.1 of IEC 65,- T0 G7 q9 X7 u3 p) `
- there are no loosened conductor which reduces creepage distances and clearances0 I; w# P& _) b6 n" }! \* d
below the required values! c" W5 Q) _9 I2 f
- when the test of sub-clause 19.11.2 is conducted with the open-circuited conductor
# W) ~) J- T* ^) {# l1 Qbridged, an other part of the PCB blow up,1 e; `! Y- Q5 N" w/ y" }$ I7 B
are the requirements of sub-clause 19.11 fulfilled?& G5 W' F' a+ v" W0 o" z
Decision: The circuit complies with the clause of the standard, if the conductor of the$ V3 o' B* C: _ \' [
PCB is considered as a intentionally weak part of the circuit.5 D: z3 ]' F' N3 [/ c% M2 H& U7 r
This can be verified by performing the test on another sample and verify that the
1 i$ A3 k. ^) `- t% _/ Nsame conductor blow up (according § 19.1 6th paragraph), and if the conductor is
% Y! E ~8 P" d0 K z& U8 ?4 odefined by the manufacturer like a specially designed weak part.$ f/ \9 \& \+ S8 |" f
2 @5 {% e* B& O$ x
& Y9 T, J% g+ [* F3 A' P
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|