|
本帖最后由 小米 于 2012-9-12 10:41 编辑 / ~$ q( _& @4 n- i
) q. O2 F" r% R4 K$ k! E0 E
| DSH 483 | Construction* K) W! ~% u* U$ r
| 22.31
$ f$ }. g- L; P5 K" l | 60335-1(ed.3)5 E5 U% C; f! a5 b
|
4 ^5 f( I/ @0 \) g& h3 ^: x; G5 g4 i; |/ X: X$ {1 E% S
Standard: IEC 60335-1:1991, 3rd Ed.8 L$ |8 Q+ `1 l4 l* Z9 Q8 y
Sub clause: 22.31
! |& n' | i2 [ lSheet No. DSH-483
; b1 i0 M- }5 N0 TSubject: Construction
1 {# P9 {" ]* \5 n! ~Key words: - snap-on connectors$ S2 |8 ]+ P7 H4 N
Decision taken at the 40th CTL meeting 2003
' |2 r/ t* P2 F/ P. TQuestion:
+ G3 O6 X" ~* r# D8 K' h! OWhat is considered an adequate construction for locking of terminals for snap on connectors?
) q6 b% j) P3 `+ b: v! h6 vRationale:% i& }' N' m: \: L+ E& R4 O6 k7 d
See question.
5 y7 C. e [# lDecision:9 Y8 }1 e! p5 h3 u4 _
A receptacle with no provision for engagement with a hole or depression in the tab is not+ a% S5 g. \9 _( M' s6 }
acceptable.
5 M( }% h2 y4 IA receptacle with provision for engagement into a hole or depression is acceptable provided6 z1 G2 I! S6 d
the tab and the receptacle meet the dimensional, insertion and withdrawal requirements of7 Y! O" ]* F3 |' O. c
IEC 760 (or CEE Recommendation 6) .$ H" f6 {6 c. \' N, V! l
Constructions with other types of positive means to prevent accidental loosening are also. w' v" ?" P' L' G
acceptable.' Z2 r2 H4 c* _
3 q7 }% S! [3 F+ a. D& E5 S/ s0 M, e5 Y& U
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|