3岁以上的玩具,都没有滥用测试作者: peterxu 时间: 2010-1-23 16:25
是呀,你说的很对哦,欧洲3+以上没有滥用测试的呀,我突然想起来以前我们送了一款拼图做EN71测试,本身无小部件,年龄3+,外部实验室判我们FAIL,FAIL的原因是 % k0 X9 z8 @" |* ~; |' _, \Remark No. Nature of Failure4 ]& X, a# b3 S" Y. G7 E& | ~) U
*1 Small part was exposed after test. However, the age warning and the indication of hazard was not. [9 ~. C, S! R: G) z) P
found on the toy or packaging.7 j" [" Z$ n+ S* J8 z2 j0 L
不做滥用,那他们是怎么产生的小部件呢?一下子头大了.呵呵作者: hewei 时间: 2010-1-23 17:18
最好发个图片上来看看作者: peterxu 时间: 2010-1-23 19:02
就是一般的拼图,hewei,麻烦你看下...作者: hewei 时间: 2010-1-23 19:44
建议:你还是问下FAILED的检测机构3 {2 v1 a: F$ y; V9 B G
我个人觉得: 如果此拼图测试年龄是3+,则不存在*1 Small part was exposed after test.. However, the age warning and the indication of hazard was not) M1 }' ]' {, E( i
found on the toy or packaging.作者: ke_cpw 时间: 2010-1-24 00:10
要加鬼仔头 + 小物件警告语 ! s8 S2 T. n# L* NEN 71 -part 1 Toys which are not intended for but MIGHT be dangerous for children under 36 months shall be accompanied by a warning, "Warning! Not suitable for children under 36 months" or "Warning! Not suitable for children under three years" (鬼仔头) 1 L( F( N0 O2 V# n& u) _: [
, h/ O/ I( q2 A. p5 @ TOGETHER with a brief indication of the specific hazard calling for this restriction. (小物件警告语) 8 _# V$ {' ?2 {: J Q. jfor example choking hazard作者: tassx 时间: 2010-1-24 00:58
主要依 section 7.1 & {+ B& J1 o; @ \" s, X' w由于正常使用（接收状态）与滥用的界限并不总是很明了，加之有怎样的危险主要是通过滥用后来界定的，W的大致做法是：测试年龄为0+，然后是否定位3+？ 警告语？作者: 亲亲我的宝贝 时间: 2010-1-24 20:23
引用第3楼hewei于2010-01-23 15:53发表的 :0 @4 u" I1 \1 T0 P( F
5 N7 X, P. s D7 o
3岁以上的玩具,都没有滥用测试