Characteristics of user available ports , s% n. \/ ~- [8 B- x* c1 ~
2 and 4" P! F1 L7 r% e0 m J9 d
60950(ed.2);am1-am4 & 60950(ed.3) 7 s5 R1 O# Y' f- W n
* H: X5 \% m- C8 r) q
Standard: IEC 60950 (1991) 2nd ed.,+ T$ v. {$ ^, }3 O; m, V4 x
Amdts.1(1992), 2(1993), 3(1995)," K9 }; H! K W* B+ H
4(1996); IEC 60950 (1991) 3rd ed. " w8 M6 s4 w% qSub clause:* F! x3 X. g1 }. J- m" e, E
2. and 46 T- w% O& Z; l m8 c* y5 i; z1 x
Sheet n. 388 4 X$ }. w) i+ { b }! f. k# \1 fPage 1 (1) . y# \8 r2 V0 }0 ^ WSubject: : g- S( \/ z5 `Characteristics of user0 W i! H5 ]6 i! w2 Y f9 }' ?
available ports 2 G4 Z) G, `9 j1 U6 a8 UKey words:0 H1 |3 W3 g0 n7 x# Z
User available ports : W) d( {: E$ s2 fDecision confirmed # e6 ~; }* m+ g/ xat CTL 38th meeting0 b8 Q8 p, Z2 g$ t% I ^' I# f
Question:) ?2 C! X$ q; ?( K
Should all user-available ports (e.g. serial, parallel, USB and similar intended for use with $ U3 G7 `& [: A ^5 vstandard accessory cables) be evaluated for compliance with electrical shock, energy or fire & J7 ~6 G3 j5 q! L+ h/ O+ @hazard even when the live ports of the connector are otherwise not accessible?$ s/ D% C& ]% t5 t# @
Decision:% C' w& C3 v8 Y8 h, N
Evaluate all user-available ports (e.g. serial, parallel, USB and similar intended for use with* E. Q( I" G- i! @) A: n* E/ B
standard accessory cables) for compliance with electrical shock, energy or fire hazards even* S. [8 [2 \3 M0 I" `
when the live parts of the connector are not accessible. , c8 }: T$ ~5 d3 P( @' F1 p/ l- V6 }- L& W
[attach]77171[/attach]! ~+ R1 y2 G; h4 {! I