UL AWM FUS样品测试地点的转移利弊分析
之前,我司的UL跟踪检查电线在美国托马斯测试,现想转移到苏州美华,经沟通美华同意。好处:1.运费减少;2.都是中国人,好沟通;
但不知如此是否有不好之处?有人说如何是IMP的样品,那你们就死惨了。但我不知何为IMP样品,问他也没下文。
所以在此请教大家 不清楚耶,待指教,不过我们公司目前为止电线跟踪服务都是寄到香港测试的 我司当时在美国托马期申请的, IMP is increased monitor procedure, when so many VNs are issued and the sample tests can not fulfill the UL's requirements, then IMP will be effective...that means IMP is a punish policy conducted by UL, normally, you don't need to be afraid of this procedure, just consider the basic condition, that's ok..
So make a conclusion, I suggest to send the regular FUS samples to UL suzhou office, it's more convenient... 引用第3楼Andy.Yang于2010-04-28 15:11发表的:
IMP is increased monitor procedure, when so many VNs are issued and the sample tests can not fulfill the UL's requirements, then IMP will be effective...that means IMP is a punish policy conducted by UL, normally, you don't need to be afraid of this procedure, just consider the basic condition, that's ok..
So make a conclusion, I suggest to send the regular FUS samples to UL suzhou office, it's more convenient...
thank you very much Another thing, I must tell you that, for AWM the regular sample tests are free, just re-sample and IPM samples need pay additional money for the tests... 引用第5楼Andy.Yang于2010-04-28 15:30发表的:
Another thing, I must tell you that, for AWM the regular sample tests are free, just re-sample and IPM samples need pay additional money for the tests...
针对你所说的“re-sample and IPM samples ”,在托马斯和苏州美华一样,需要支持额外的money.
所以这一点是没有区别的 Which kind of AWM your factory is making? What I know, so many years ago, the wire samples don't need to sent to Camas, just Hongkong and Suzhou office is ok.... 楼上的是UL的, 说的比较准确 引用第8楼jianbliu于2010-04-28 19:12发表的:
楼上的是UL的, 说的比较准确
Yes, you're right, I'm UL expert, specialist....
But, hua! I AM KIDDING......
页:
[1]
2